The Walls of the Slaughterhouses are Already Transparent

The animal rights movement is "breaking" the walls of the slaughterhouses for more than 30 years. The walls of the slaughterhouses are already transparent.

You tell them the facts, and you show them the horrible reality, and it doesn’t help.

We will never understand how people can eat the flesh of someone that has been bred in misery and pain but they do.

Most humans don’t even understand what we are talking about.

Humans’ moral rule is "Do whatever you like as long as you can get away with it".

Not anymore! This is a call for the annihilation movement to rise.

* Text taken from the Only One Solution website.

Violence and Control are a Part of Us

There is a reason why humans see leather as cool and sexy.
Violence and control are a part of us.

You can fight it and explain to people that it is wrong and that animals suffer for it.
You can tell people that they can buy synthetic materials instead.

But leather is a lot more than a material that jackets are made of.

Leather is status. it is a symbol.

Trying to convince people to buy synthetic fabrics is not how you change things.

Synthetic fabric is synthetic revolution.

Humans want leather because it is a symbol of power and domination. The problem is internal and there is no jacket in the world that can ever change that.

* Text taken from the Only One Solution website.

Trends

The campaign against fur was once considered to be the most successful campaign ever by the animal rights movement. But after almost a decade of being branded politically incorrect, fur is back in fashion, coming in all colors, shapes and sizes.

The Fur Council claims that in 1985 only 42 fashion designers included fur in their collections. 20 years later the number has risen to more than 500.

The fur industry resurgence in the last 5 years is an irrefutable evidence of the sole significance of trends in human behavior and public political views.

It is not empathy, rationality, concern and ethics that dictate humans’ behavior, it is fashion, in this case ambiguously speaking. It is trends, not rational and practical compassion.

In spite of Al gore, Cindy Crawford, the Atkins diet, super size me and so many other trendy examples, activists still rely on trends and on celebrities to carry on moral and social justice campaigns.

Animal rights activists know just as we do how provisional and arbitrary trends are and that the same people that are against slaughtering animals for their fur, turn around and eat their flesh, or wear their skin.

Disappointment after disappointment, but the activists never learn.

They cover their eyes and ears because they can't control their urge for a short term goal.

The expectation that the same principle of action only using the good celebrities in a smart and sexy way will change the world is false and ridiculous. The same methods that are responsible for so much of what is wrong with the world can’t be the solution too.

Instead of looking for the current trends and how to use them for their goals, instead of dividing the world to good and bad celebrities.

Animal rights activist should ask themselves what are the chances for a vegan non-speciesist world when the moral message becomes a minor by product of the current trend and the mega celebrities’ reputation improvement efforts.

* Text taken from the Only One Solution website.

Thanksgiving Feast

A dead turkey is what symbolizes more than anything, a holyday that is supposed to symbolize humans’ thankfulness to god for all the wealth he supposedly gave them.

It seems to be absurd that even the day that symbolizes humans’ gratitude to god, nature and everything around them, they celebrate it by ignorance, violence and contempt to everything around them.

Hundreds of millions of turkeys are tortured for months, murdered and eaten in the thanksgiving feast.

A violent feast of ostentation and hypocrisy.

It symbolizes how greedy and boastful humans are. Not modest and grateful.

Unfortunately it is not surprising that this is their thanks.

A critical examination of humans’ nature and of life in general, makes it very logical. And when atrocities like these are logical…

What is your dilemma?

* Text taken from the Only One Solution website.

Nonviolence

The non violent approach which is both speciesist and ironically extremely violent.

The non violent approach is speciesist because it is non violent towards humans but at the same time and as a consequence it is violent towards non human animals.
It gives humans an automatic and evident power to decide whether or not they are willing to stop torturing. It is not supposed to be the abusers' decision and the animal rights activists let the abusers make this decision, a decision that regards other creatures' suffer.

The non violent approach is violent because refusing to use violence to stop much more violence is actually supporting violence. From the moment you are aware of the possibility to stop someone’s suffer using violence and you refuse to use it, you choose suffer.

The speciesist and violent approach is in the concept that the one and only duty of activists is to convince the abusers to stop abusing and not to stop the abuse.
As far as most activists think, their variety of options is expressed in persuasion methods only. The basic approach is hardly ever questioned. Convincing people to divert their diet is the only option, the differences are in the ways to do it.
If something didn't work they will try another but all the options have the same in common, they all are different tactics with the same strategy, to convince the abusers to stop abusing, but not to stop the abusers.

When you maintain a non violent approach, if you fail to convince a non-vegan speciesist, he is free to go and continue the abuse.
It shouldn’t be their choice. You don’t ask the tortures if they would like to stop torturing. You just stop them.

We know it is not easy as "just" stopping them, but it is what we’ve got to do. It begins with you realizing the absurdity. With you stop asking the oppressors to stop oppressing and start to find a way to stop it all.

* Text taken from the Only One Solution website.

Simply The Best

Humans are the best species ever!

Asleep

A world which battery cages could have been invented in, is a world that unlegislating them won't cure anything.

The animal rights movement must wake up.

Society is irrevocably speciesist and immoral.

Gains made are easily reversed.

History has shown that working within the cruel system and winning small battles for the animals proved to be irrelevant. The animals’ carnage continues.

Animal abuse will go on until mankind becomes extinct, or the planet is destroyed.

It’s time to open our eyes and admit that we shall never overcome.

The opposition is stronger, better financed, and more numerous than animal defenders.

If you are only interested in clearing your conscience, you better stay in the conventional movement.

If you are interested in liberating billions of animals and humans from life full of suffer... there is only one solution.

* Much of the text taken from the Only One Solution website.

Innocents When They Sleep

In order to produce comfort pillows and worm blankets for humans, this is the "discomfort" geese "have" to endure...

Humans are not innocents even when they sleep.

* Text taken from the Only One Solution website.

Absurd (vivisection)

Animal rights activists claim that vivisection is absurd because it is unscientific and unsafe for humans.

Don't you think it is absurd that animal rights activists are fighting for good science instead of a sufferless world?

Using the unscientific argument is speciesism. Non humans’ suffer is the strongest case against vivisection, a fact that is totally absent in the anti vivisection movement.

It is a moral issue not a scientific one. If you have reached the point that you hang on the few doctors that go against animal experiments as your best case against vivisection, then the animals have a problem that no alternative could solve.

Problems should be solved from the roots and the root is an historical crime against weaker creatures in an excuse of human superiority. The problem is in the way humans see animals not in the way scientists see science.

If activists believe humans are too insensitive towards non-human suffering, then they must fight against them, not for them.

* Much of the text taken from the Only One Solution website.

Rodents (vivisection)

85% of animal experiments are preformed on rodents.

Still... it is not accidental that the animal rights movement unproportionately demonstrates experiments on specific species which represent only 2% of the total number of animal experiments.

Animal rights activists don't believe it is possible that humans will be rational and moral to oppose the torture of a creature regardless of his species.

They know that it is easier to influence humans when showing them animals that humans see as their pets like dogs and cats, cute animals like rabbits, and monkeys that are similar to humans more than any other species.

If the animal rights movement is failing in saving humans' closest species , what chance do mice, rats and guinea pigs have?

* Text taken from the Only One Solution website.

Sadism as a Starting Point

The animal rights movement calls bullfights, rodeos, circuses, marine parks and zoos violence in disguise of entertainment.

The truth unfortunately is much worse.

It is entertainment.

The human race is entertained by torture and abuse.

Humans seek for the power and dominance over other species and they enjoy it. There is no other way to explain the amusement children get from brutally murdering a bull or aggressively roping a calf.

Bullfights, circuses and rodeos are some sort of a celebration of humans’ victory over other species, a symbolic display of their tyranny.

We have to comprehend this. Enjoying such a brutal and violent shows, like rodeos, bullfights and circuses are a part of the human race’s nature.

You can try to convince people not to participate, you can try to promote legislation against those cruel acts, you can demonstrate, you can liberate a few animals, but you can’t change the fact that this is a part of the human race. Humans enjoy humiliating and hurting others - humans and non humans.

Stop fighting the symptoms, deal with the real problem.

* Much of the text taken from the Only One Solution website.

Eating Meat is Just a Symptom

To convince someone to go vegan as an attempt to save the world is similar to an attempt to save a sinking ship by tossing out water with a teaspoon.

The world is not just an unfair and cruel place, everything is rotten from the roots.

The world is too sick, and life itself is the disease.

Wake up!

A world, that battery cages could have been invented in, is a world that unlegislating them won’t cure anything.

Battery cages are just a symptom. Eating meat is just symptom.

Two of the severest ones, but still symptoms.

The only way to stop the symptoms of the problem is to identify the main root cause and directly work to abolish it.

Stop dealing with the symptoms and start dealing with the causes.

* Much of the text taken from the Only One Solution website.

Reason is Not Enough

Have you ever wondered why is it so hard to convince someone to go vegan?

We don't need to tell you how morally initiatory and how nutritiously simple veganism is.

So how come it is so hard, even for many people who define themselves as "animal lovers", to become vegans?

Could it be that the obstacle to veganism is the messengers? Not enough health food stores? The price of soy milk? Not enough vegan celebrities? Not enough visual evidence about what is going on in factory farms?

You know it is not any of these.

The animal rights arguments are so simple and right. They are based on solid facts and evidences. Nobody can confront them rationally.

So why is it so hard to convince someone to go vegan?

The reason is that reason is not enough. Good arguments are not relevant.

Rationality is not enough in this world. It has proved itself as an insufficient element in order to change people’s habits.

Rationality can’t beat motivation.

"... humans are much more social than rational creatures. In everyday life on average, people try to merge into society, behave correspondingly, and afterwards rationalize their behaviour, i.e. find "rational" reasons why they act as they act. This observation is so obvious that it does not seem to merit quoting empirical support."
- Martin Balluch -

* Non-quotation text taken from the Only One Solution website.