Absurd (vivisection)

Animal rights activists claim that vivisection is absurd because it is unscientific and unsafe for humans.

Don't you think it is absurd that animal rights activists are fighting for good science instead of a sufferless world?

Using the unscientific argument is speciesism. Non humans’ suffer is the strongest case against vivisection, a fact that is totally absent in the anti vivisection movement.

It is a moral issue not a scientific one. If you have reached the point that you hang on the few doctors that go against animal experiments as your best case against vivisection, then the animals have a problem that no alternative could solve.

Problems should be solved from the roots and the root is an historical crime against weaker creatures in an excuse of human superiority. The problem is in the way humans see animals not in the way scientists see science.

If activists believe humans are too insensitive towards non-human suffering, then they must fight against them, not for them.

* Much of the text taken from the Only One Solution website.

Rodents (vivisection)

85% of animal experiments are preformed on rodents.

Still... it is not accidental that the animal rights movement unproportionately demonstrates experiments on specific species which represent only 2% of the total number of animal experiments.

Animal rights activists don't believe it is possible that humans will be rational and moral to oppose the torture of a creature regardless of his species.

They know that it is easier to influence humans when showing them animals that humans see as their pets like dogs and cats, cute animals like rabbits, and monkeys that are similar to humans more than any other species.

If the animal rights movement is failing in saving humans' closest species , what chance do mice, rats and guinea pigs have?

* Text taken from the Only One Solution website.