Animal rights activists claim that vivisection is absurd because it is unscientific and unsafe for humans.
Don't you think it is absurd that animal rights activists are fighting for good science instead of a sufferless world?
Using the unscientific argument is speciesism. Non humans’ suffer is the strongest case against vivisection, a fact that is totally absent in the anti vivisection movement.
It is a moral issue not a scientific one. If you have reached the point that you hang on the few doctors that go against animal experiments as your best case against vivisection, then the animals have a problem that no alternative could solve.
Problems should be solved from the roots and the root is an historical crime against weaker creatures in an excuse of human superiority. The problem is in the way humans see animals not in the way scientists see science.
If activists believe humans are too insensitive towards non-human suffering, then they must fight against them, not for them.
* Much of the text taken from the Only One Solution website.
